Ok, I can finally post up now...I've been working both jobs for the past couple of days, and haven't had the time to read through much...took me 45minutes to catch up!
All right, not sure where to start but hopefully I can help shed some light on the issues that came up on the Herdstone website...
*Cliff: I think Cliff is great people, and always fun to talk with, so long as the conversation doesn't lean towards Josh. However, I myself and several other SoCal GW League players have felt "burned" at a couple Strategicon events, one in particular. This is what finally got us all to not attend, as we saw no point in traveling that far to play in a Tournament that was set at a fair level of playing. I still feel Cliff is good people, and would've loved to have gotten a chance to play him at the Broadside Bash, maybe next year!
*Strategicon: We used to always look forward to playing in this event, but after a couple of bad experiences, many of us started to shy away from it. I'll explain one now in detail...
It was about a year and a half ago, I think it was the late year Strategicon event, the second to last one Cliff and the Game Empire San Diego ran. I brought up several players as usual for the Tourney; Billy May (Slaanesh Daemonic Legions), Joey Delarosa (Skaven), Alex (Skaven), Toby Walker (Dwarfs) and we met up with many of my fellow SCGWL buddies-Dana Hohn (Bretonnians), Clive Henrick (Empire), Steve Masuta (Skaven), Stefan Viterstadt (Dark Elves), Ben Richard (Ogre Kingdoms), Ron McLaughlin (Tomb Kings), Jon Napier (Chaos Mortals) and Big Quinten Bohn (Khorne Beasts of Chaos).
Saturday had the 40K side and there was some questions raised about the Painting Scores handed out by the judging staff, as well as pairings, but I didn't really pay much attention to it...
Sunday comes, and we play. Round 1 I was paired up against Ben Richard's buddy, Stienz and his Bretonnians. Billy faced Steve Masuta's Skaven, Toby played Dana Hohn, Stefan against a Khorne Daemon Army, etc. I edged out a Solid Victory (17pts), Steve Masuta got a Massacre (20pts) over Billy, Stefan had a Massacre over his opponent, and so on.
In round 2, I played Masuta (it was the first time we've ever played!), and thought "oh wow, must've been and odd amount of Massacres" since I had a Solid Victory and he had a Massacre after game #1. Cliff actually pulled up a chair to watch most of our game because he thought we're both good players, and that it should be a good match up...it was! My first of several battles now against Masuta all ending in Draws thus far...so 10pts for the both of us. Stefan gained another Massacre, so another 20 pts for him, Clive Henrick's Empire Massacred Dana Hohn's Bretonnians, Ron McLaughlin gained a Massacre over Big Quentin's Khorne Beasts.
Ron ended up having to pull out because his wife callled, and threatend him with divorce if he didn't get home soon!

So he had to bow out. Now, according to Cliff, Ron was out in front as the top spot after Round 2 with all scores combined...
In round 3, after my Solid Victory (17pts) and Draw (10pts), I played my nemesis and good friend Stefan Viterstadt who had 2 Massacres! (40pts) Steve Masuta had a Massacre (20pts) and a Draw (10pts) but faced Clive Henrick who had 2 Massacres (40pts) as well. Funny thing is, Stefan and I are always back and forth on wins/losses/draw versus each other, so the pairing seemed really, really strange and Masuta usually beats Clive when they face off. We asked Cliff about the pairings, and he said everying is in order, so we didn't question it again...he's a nice guy and we never thought there'd be some odd pairings going on.
Stefan and I get another Draw against each other, and Clive gets Massacred by Steve Masuta (again)...we basically eliminate each other from contention for Overall as the guy who won (none of us knew him) with Tomb Kings played all 3 games against his friends, won all 3 (Massacres if I remember right), got really high soft scores for it along with high Painting scores judged by Cliff and one of his friends. Honestly, the Tomb King Army was alright looking, but it didn't deserve the high marks it was given.
Sooooo...the young guy (again, don't know him) takes the Overall spot and all of us were like "WHO???"...while Jon Napier and Richard Bark took Best Appearance/Best Themed, and I took Best Sportsmanship. Cliff of course couldn't understand this one, since I had a "broken Daemon list" and made a little comment about it before he handed out the award to me. I just laughed and took it as he was joking.
So to us, the L.A., Inland Empire, O.C., etc. players the Tournament didn't run correctly and the outcome wasn't what it would've been normally. This made for some bad perceptions of Cliff, and thus all San Diego gamers. Throw in the fact that Henry Herz originates from San Diego and has a horrible reputation with all the stores and League players out this way, and it just made for a really bad circumstance.
I've talked with Quentin, who's the main person with issues towards Cliff. Nothing personally against him, just how he runs tournaments. I know they've exchanged PM's, and are trying to work things out, and for the gaming community as a whole, I hope they do!
I know Kurt and Wade and several others have come under some heat, but it's to be expected when you run an event like this. I took my share of lumps from the SoCal Slaughter stemming from Army Comp Scores, to tough Scenarios, to time lagging in between rounds, to Rules issues. It just goes with the Territory.
Bob Felix has made some really good points, one mainly that to the non-San Diego gamers, the Pacific Marauders and San Diego gamers are one in the same. Just as "LA" gamers seem to be all one in the same, though there's several different cliques, Leagues and Clubs.
I don't agree with Army Comp for Pairings being thrown out. I think it sets a really good tone/atmosphere for the Tournament. The biggest compliment I've gotten from the first SoCal Slaughter was using this system, which is now wide spread amongst the Indy GTs. It was also mentioned to me, via the other guys at the Broadside Bash, that they loved that you guys (Pac Mods) inocorporated it into your event.
As I've learned the hard way, Scoring a Tournament can be tricky and many spots are open to subjectivity of a Judge. GW uses me for a Rules Judge in many of the Tournaments (LA Gamesday, Bunker Tourneys, etc.) and that's a role I'm comfortable with. Judging Army Comp I'm also comfortable with, as I've played since the dawn of time it seems, with everything and against everything several times over. Painting I'm not too keen on, so I had another guy (Toby Walker) judge that as he took 2nd Best Appearance at the Vegas GT for his Eldar. Still, the open scoring of players for their opponent's Sportsmanship is hard to truly track and measure, as is their views on Army Comp.
It's my firm belief that players who bring softer or more balanced Armies should be rewarded for it by playing other such Armies in Rounds 1 and 2 at a big Tournament, while the Power Gamers can unleash their fury upon one another early on and get it all out of their systems. Nothing sucks more then to see "John Doe" with his Orc Infantry Army get mauled horridly by a Double-Skull Chukka Army in game #1, then get blasted to bits by the 2nd Gen. Slaan and Skink/Salamander Army of Doom...it can really put a damper on these players views of the Tournament scene.
After Round 2 though, I think Battle Points only are a must!
Oh, and I do feel it fair and right within the Tournament organizers to move pairings around a bit to cater some to the players who face off all the time. After all, the Tournament is for them, right? I had no problem doing this for Robert Felix and Ken Krogman (?) at the Slaughter because it was my Tournament, and it was for the benefit of it as a whole to do so.
I hope this clears up some misconceptions between the different gaming clubs/leagues, and if there's any questions or thoughts, I'd be more then willing to answer them in full! I'm striving to get the Southern California gaming world to work smoothly with one another...I know it can be done!